THIRD-PARTY FUNDING IN ARBITRATIONS IN NIGERIA: A NEW REGIME UNDER THE ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION ACT, 2023

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email
Share on whatsapp
Share on print

By Abiodun V. Ogunnubi

THIRD-PARTY FUNDING IN ARBITRATIONS IN NIGERIA: A NEW REGIME UNDER THE ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION ACT, 2023

  1. Introduction

Access to justice is a basic principle of the rule of law, which describes the ability of any person, regardless of income, to use the legal system to advocate for themselves and their interests. The cost of prosecuting a matter either using the litigation or arbitration mechanisms has over the years transcended the pocket of the common man and would require a sponsor or a third party to advocate their rights and/ or interests. However, third parties are prohibited from sponsoring or providing funds to either prosecute or defend an unconnected party’s action under the common law doctrine of ‘maintenance and champerty’.

Third-party funding has become a common discourse in international and domestic arbitration. However, prior to the enactment of the Arbitration and Mediation Act (AMA), 2023 the concept of third-party funding of arbitral proceedings in Nigeria was far-flung and an unattainable dream. Third-party funding was not applicable to arbitrations conducted in Nigeria because of the common law doctrine of the torts of maintenance and champerty. However, the enactment of the AMA changed the above regime, with the abolition of the torts of maintenance and champerty in Section 61 of the AMA.

This article seeks to examine third-party funding of arbitral proceedings pre and post the AMA, the abolition of the common law doctrine of champerty and maintenance, and the challenges and prospects under the new regime in Nigeria.

For the full article, please click the link.

 

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get updates and learn from the best

More To Explore

The Nigerian Merchandise Marks Act: A viable or obsolete piece of legislation – Sandra Eke

Unlike other intellectual property laws enacted in Nigeria, the Merchandise Marks Act[2] (“the Act”) doesn’t enjoy so much popularity. The Act, which was first introduced in the United Kingdom to preclude non-British nationals from distributing their goods in Britain and Europe under the false pretences that such goods had a royal warrant and were manufactured in Britain,[3] was also adopted in Nigeria to curb the growing incidences of forgery and falsification of trademarks and other related offence.