THE ROLE OF PRIVACY ENHANCING TECHNOLOGIES (PETs) IN ATTAINING DATA PROTECTION COMPLIANCE IN NIGERIA

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email
Share on whatsapp
Share on print

8th April 2024

By Eke Sandra

 

 

 

THE ROLE OF PRIVACY ENHANCING TECHNOLOGIES (PETs) IN ATTAINING DATA PROTECTION COMPLIANCE IN NIGERIA

 

  1. Introduction

Personal data security is paramount in safeguarding individuals’ privacy, fostering trust in digital interactions, ensuring legal compliance, preserving business continuity, and protecting against cyber threats. By prioritizing data security measures and adopting a proactive approach to risk management, organizations can uphold their obligations to data subjects, maintain their reputation, and thrive in today’s digital world through the use of privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs). PETs adopt engineered systems such as secure multiparty computations, homomorphic encryption, anonymisation, differential privacy, mix networks, anonymous digital credentials etc., that provide acceptable levels of privacy. They are information security techniques that enhance privacy, protects and reduces the risk of personal data exposure to unauthorized third parties. They incorporate primary data protection principles by minimising the usage of personal information, maximising data security, and empowering data subjects. PETs play a vital role in aiding organizations achieve and maintain compliance with data protection laws and regulations, especially as it relates to data security. In Nigeria, the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) requires data controllers/processors to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure the security, integrity, and confidentiality of personal data in their possession or under their control, in addition to adhering to global principles of data processing. PETs could help data controllers/processors under the Nigerian regulatory purview achieve compliance in this regard. In this article, we examine the benefits of PETs and how data controllers/processors can effectively leverage on these tools to attain data protection compliance in Nigeria.

For the full article, please click the link

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get updates and learn from the best

More To Explore

HAS THE SUPREME COURT CREATED A NEW EXCEPTION TO THE APPLICATION OF SECTION 2(A) OF THE PUBLIC OFFICERS’ PROTECTION ACT? – ABDULKABIR BADMOS

In most cases instituted against a Public Officer, under Nigeria’s dispute resolution system, it is not uncommon to find a Defendant raising either by way of preliminary objection or outright defence to a claim that the cause of action has become statute barred by virtue of the provisions of Section 2(a) of the Public Officers’ Protection Act (POPA).[2] The section provides that for any action brought against a public officer to be valid, it must be instituted in a competent court of law within a period of three (3) months from the accrual of the cause of action. This article seeks to highlight some of the exceptions to this rule that has been judicially recognized overtime including the most recent Supreme Court pronouncement that has seemingly added a new exception.