CAC Issues Guidelines on Holding of Annual General Meetings of Public Companies using Proxies

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email
Share on whatsapp
Share on print

Compliance & Regulatory

CAC ISSUES GUIDELINES ON HOLDING OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETINGS OF PUBLIC COMPANIES USING PROXIES

On 26th March 2020, the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) issued a circular on guidelines for public companies to hold their annual general meeting (AGM) by proxies (pursuant to Section 230 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA)). The guidelines are as follows:

  • The approval of the CAC shall be obtained before such a meeting is held. The application can be submitted to the Head Office in Abuja or any of the branch offices in any of the States.
  • CAC shall send representative(s) as observer(s) to the meeting.
  • The meeting shall only discuss the Ordinary Business of an AGM as provided in S.214 CAMA.
  • Notice of meeting and proxy form shall be sent to every member in accordance with the requirements of CAMA. Companies will be required to provide the CAC with the evidence of postage or delivery of such notices after the meeting.
  • All the members shall be advised in the notice that in view of the Covid-19 pandemic, attendance shall only be by proxy with names and particulars of the proposed proxies listed for them to select therefrom. The invitation shall be issued at the companies’ expense as well as the stamp duties which shall be prepaid by the company. The proxies need not be members of the company.
  • The company shall be guided by the provisions of its Articles or CAMA as regards to a quorum. However, for the purpose of determining quorum, each duly completed proxy form shall be counted as one.

Comment

Companies all over the world are facing unprecedented challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, as they seek to meet with their financial obligations, comply with statutory requirements, protect shareholder value and ensure the safety of their employees.

Public companies have statutory and regulatory filing requirements that mandate the approval of their financial statements and accounts at an AGM to be held within a fixed period. Thus, the restrictions on movement and gatherings due to the COVID-19 have impacted the ability of the shareholders of public companies to participate at AGMs that have been previously scheduled.

The CAC’s regulatory intervention is laudable, but a mandated proxy model may not be accepted by shareholders or shareholder groups.

Look out for our publication on the impact of COVID-19 on AGM of Companies.

 

___________________________________________________________________

For further information on this topic, please contact Bolaji Gabari and Ayodele Adeniyi at S. P. A. Ajibade & Co., Lagos by telephone (+234.1.460.5091, 460.5092), or e-mail (bgabari@spaajibade.com and aadeniyi@spaajibade.com)

The SPA Ajibade & Co website can be accessed at www.spaajibade.com

Get the PDF here: CAC ISSUES GUIDELINES ON HOLDING OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETINGS d

 

 

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get updates and learn from the best

More To Explore

Legal Implication of Non – Registration of Technology Transfer Agreements under the NOTAP Act – Uche Mathew and Olukolade Ehinmosan

Introduction:
The Nigerian Court of Appeal (Lagos Division) recently quashed the decision of the (trial) Federal High Court and held that the non-registration of a technology transfer agreement under the National Office for Technology Acquisition and Promotion (NOTAP) Act neither renders such agreement invalid nor unenforceable.

In reaching this decision, the Court beamed its searchlight on the literal interpretation of relevant sections of the NOTAP Act. The Court held that nothing in the Act portrays the intention of the lawmaker as meaning that the non-registration of a technology transfer agreement would render such agreement defective, invalid and unenforceable. The Court made this conclusion while softly deprecating the trial Court for displaying ‘purposeful judicial creativity’ at the expense of giving literal effect to the clear and unambiguous words of the NOTAP Act.